Further, in order to fully evaluate this claim the audience needs to learn more about the interview questions that Dr. Karp’s team used—what exactly did they ask? We don’t know,武威雅思冲刺, nor do we know what the children’s responses actually were. What did they say about their biological parents? The mere fact that they speak more frequently about their biological parents than they do about other adults does not mean that their biological parents had a greater role than the community did in their rearing. It would significantly undermine Dr,武威雅思冲刺. Karp’s argument if it turned out that the children said things like how much they missed their parents or how their parents had left them in a communal environment,武威雅思冲刺. Without knowing what the children said, one cannot accept the argument above without reservations.
例56:学校的主要功能是给下一代灌输知识。
翻译:The main function of school is impart knowledge to the next generation.
例57:艺术不属于学校的主科。
翻译:Arts is not regarded as a core curriculum at school.
例:因为不够明朗的经济前景,很多工作不可能招聘新的职员。
翻译:Because of unclear/ ambiguous economic outlook, many companies are unlikely to recruit new employments.
例59:空运可能产生很多温室气体。
翻译:Air freight is likely to exhaust a large number of greenhouse gases.
例60:孩子很有可能有行为的问题。
翻译:The children are likely to meet behavior problems.
【本段结构】本段采用了标准的Argument正文段结构,即:概括*二个逻辑错误的错误类型和其在原文中出现的位置,接下来给出合理的理由和他因来反驳原文。【本段功能】本段作为正文*二段,攻击原文中出现的*二个重要逻辑错误——调查类错误。根据原文,Karp博士和他的研究生们对“居住于包括Tertia岛在内的一系列岛屿上的孩子们”开展了研究。如果他们**采访过一个Tertia的孩子,其结论将被明显地削弱。例如,事实有可能是Tertia岛上的孩子们被集体抚养,而附近其它岛屿上的孩子们均由他们的亲生父母抚养。